tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-86943829117012891422024-02-19T02:04:19.844-05:00Diverging AnalysisDivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-8528162308293674952018-05-29T02:58:00.004-04:002018-05-29T02:58:55.957-04:00Cold Takes: GameFaceHi internet,<br />
<br />
It's Cat again. This time I watched a TV show.<br />
<br />
<b>Streaming Service: </b>I found GameFace on Hulu. You can watch all 6 episodes of series 1.<br />
<br />
<b>Temperature:</b> Lukewarm. Series 1 aired from October to November 2017.<br />
<br />
I quite liked the show. I wouldn't claim it's without flaws but I found it a pleasant diversion and in half hour increments, it never overstays its welcome. The show was created and written by Roisin Conaty. I enjoyed her appearance on Travel Man but I wouldn't say I'm a fan. However, it didn't take her long to win me over as Marcella, the protagonist of the show. GameFace certainly isn't treading unfamiliar ground with 20- to 30-something messiness framed by life coaching sessions that are essentially unhelpful therapy. Where GameFace stands apart for me is its affably casual demeanor. Characters are able to make bad decisions without the show grinding your face in misery and watching someone you've grown to like be repeatedly fail and be humiliated. (Looking at you, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend.) Marcella's life isn't fixed overnight but she isn't constantly sliding backwards either because the show is afraid of letting her make progress. Progress is just slow because life is difficult. There's a balance between drama and comedy but I have to admit, most of the jokes don't land for me. However, there's at least one thing an episode that makes me laugh and for me, that's pretty decent for a half hour comedy. For example, in the pilot, I just cringed at the Friends guy but they got me with the guard who tackles her off the roof. If I had a criticism, it's that the show doesn't feel grounded enough. I don't need every lie to lead to an exposure or confrontation but the show lacks stakes when we know she has money problems but hasn't done anything to earn money and yet continues using services (life coaching, driving lessons) that require money. One character's drug addiction seems so well-managed that you wonder about the urgency of rehabilitation. That said, if there is a series 2, I hope they find a way to keep Jon her (currently unpaid?) driving instructor on the show. I would miss his lovely soft voice and reluctant but sweet supportiveness. I'm glad she has girlfriends and roommates as well but there's something that warms my heart about Jon always being there for her with his car... even if it's because she keeps forgetting her appointments for driving lessons.<br />
<br />DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-80254573323498346862018-03-03T04:41:00.000-05:002018-03-03T04:46:09.838-05:00Cold Takes: ChloeHi internet,<br />
<br />
Cat here. I watched another movie.<br />
<br />
<b>Streaming Service: </b>Chloe was on Netflix but it was about to expire so it was a now or never kind of thing for me.<br />
<br />
<b>Temperature: </b>Chilled. This movie came out in 2009. I remember reading a positive Roger Ebert review at the time. Spoiler: I did not see what he apparently saw in it.<br />
<br />
<b>WARNING: </b>Spoilers for Chloe<br />
<br />
What can I say? I have a certain affinity for bad movies. I'm one of those people who likes referencing Showgirls. I thought this movie was very middle of the road. As a philosophical drama musing on marriage and womanhood and people, I thought it was mostly a failure. There are a couple of okay monologues saved by the queen, Julianne Moore, but that's about it. As a trashy, scandalous addition to the canon of crazy stalkers (who these days are mostly relegated to Lifetime movies) I also found it to be a disappointment. You get to see Julianne Moore and Amanda Seyfried naked if you're into that but this movie's project isn't even really the objectification of female bodies.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
The beginning of the movie is rather odd. It sort of gestures at objectification and a voyeur-like perspective but there are racier shots in commercials. Mostly I just focused on the fact that Amanda Seyfried, who plays Chloe, does not have the right voice for voiceovers. She seemed very miscast in this movie. She is very pretty and the camera loved her blonde hair but aside from making use of her large, teary eyes in a few scenes, she didn't make much sense as Chloe. She wasn't much of a seductress or the chameleon the opening voiceover implies that she is. Instead, her performance and the bad writing gives it away almost immediately (for me I was certain around the 30 minute mark) that she's just lying to Catherine (Julianne Moore).<br />
<br />
In order to sell this plot, David (Liam Neeson) is inexplicably a jerk to his wife. He flirts with every woman he sees and he acts distant when he's around Catherine. Still, Seyfried is so obvious and the writing they give her when Chloe feeds into Catherine's neuroses and insecurities by spinning fantasies about seducing David is so bad that you know he's not cheating on Catherine. I mean, seriously, WTF was with that garden nonsense? I'm very cynical about men and even I didn't buy a word of that. It's amazing that Catherine does, given that she actually knows David and none of this behavior sounds like it's natural for a human, let alone his character as its been established.<br />
<br />
The fact that Chloe doesn't make any effort to be believable implies that this is all about Catherine's issues. And to an extent it is. Catherine is already spying on Chloe from her office window before she even suspects David is cheating on her. If you pick up on the fact that Chloe is obviously lying then you can watch the movie as Chloe's seduction of Catherine through her insecurities and latent desires. (Though, before you assume that this movie is about Catherine's unacknowledged lesbianism or bisexuality, it's not. Though itt's oddly casual about nonheterosexual desire in that nobody makes a big deal about it, neither is the movie about Catherine secretly wanting to be with a woman while being trapped in a heterosexual marriage.) Catherine should be able to see through Chloe from the start. Aside from the incredibly bad account of the garden encounter, Chloe is textbook Single White Female-ing. She falls off her bike and later pretends to have a cold to appeal to Catherine's nurturing instincts as a doctor and as a mother whose son is rejecting her attention and parenting. Chloe randomly kisses her after telling her she slept with David. Chloe emails her a photo of them in bed together the night after she finally seduces Catherine. Catherine finds Chloe in bed with her son. Throughout all of this, Catherine's dialogue does not imply that she thinks Chloe is insane or disturbed. WHICH IS CRAZY. Instead she says things like it's her fault for inviting Chloe into her marriage and that she shouldn't have led her on.<br />
<br />
The movie doesn't seem to have a clear sense of what it's trying to do. On the one hand, Chloe seems like a device for Catherine to work out her issues in her marriage to David and her anxieties about aging and desire. This reading gels with how unbelievable Chloe's lies are and the way Catherine keeps getting sucked back in spite of it. It also fits with the way Catherine sought her out in the first place and how Chloe sacrifices herself at the end of the movie instead of putting up a fight. She's just a plot device contrived to let Catherine explore her issues, right? It's not ideal storytelling but at least it's understandable. With this reading, the movie is almost like Afternoon Delight (2013) but with more salacious elements.<br />
<br />
Well, that doesn't fit with the crazy stalker narrative where Chloe does make an effort to keep drawing Catherine in. Chloe has a tremendous amount of agency and, even if it's contrived, she does manage to manipulate Catherine. As noted, the movie does not seem to be about Catherine's unacknowledged desire for a woman. While her interactions with Chloe eventually lead her to being honest with David, this isn't something she's pursuing herself. Chloe is the one who can't let go. Until she does (literally) for... reasons.<br />
<br />
I cannot believe this movie was written by a woman.<br />
<br />
<b>CONCLUSION: </b>Maybe use one of the Julianne Moore speeches if you need a short acting monologue. Otherwise, watch Afternoon Delight (2013). It's not perfect but it's a better, more thoughtful movie.<br />
<br />
<b>And now for some other flaws in the movie... </b><br />
<br />
<ul>
<li>The music cues are overly dramatic when nothing is happening. I've heard worse but this wasn't great. </li>
<li>It's weird that everything is so convenient. Why was Catherine spying on Chloe at the start of the movie? Is it just that she's beautiful (as the character repeatedly says)? </li>
<li>Also, when she goes to the bar to hire Chloe, they've met in the bathroom of a different restaurant. That's been their one interaction. When Catherine sits at the bar, how does Chloe know that she's there to see her?</li>
<li>Seriously, why is Catherine completely unable to discipline her son? He brings a girl home and they have sex in his room and she's completely powerless in this interaction because he closes the door? What? </li>
<li>I don't care if he's a hormonal teenage boy. It is bonkers that the son doesn't think any of Chloe's behavior is weird. He meets her as a patient of his mom. She follows him to the copy room and starts asking him about himself. Then she shows up at what I assume is his school some time later when he's at hockey practice with a CD. What the actual fuck? Then she shows up at his house in the middle of the night and he invites her in and they have sex in his parents' bed. I can't. They imply that he's had some mental health issues but come on. I know she's young and pretty but you're not the slightest bit suspicious about this predatory behavior? </li>
<li>The movie gestures vaguely at making a comment on sex workers and whether paying someone is enough to treat the person as disposable and ignore the emotional consequences. Except it does it very badly and never completes what it's trying to say so it's basically pointless.</li>
<li>When Chloe finally turns violent, her weapon of choice is a very symbolic hairpin (It's large like a hair stick but it has two prongs). I get that it's a SYMBOL but on the list of threatening weapons it is very low. I don't know why Catherine doesn't just overpower her if the only thing she has to threaten her with is basically a two-pronged stabbing device. It's not even a knife. It's like a letter opener. </li>
</ul>
<br />
<br />DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-3416142245061472012018-02-07T11:09:00.001-05:002018-03-03T04:48:01.577-05:00Cold Takes: The Founder<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hi internet,<br />
<br />
Cat here. I'm not sure what the format of this series is going to be but I hope you'll stick with me as I figure it out. Today I'm just going for stream of consciousness. Light discussion of the movie but no major spoilers.<br />
<br />
<b>Streaming Service: </b>You can find The Founder on<b> </b>Netflix.<br />
<br />
<b>Mood: </b>I wasn't feeling great when I sat down to watch a movie but I didn't want to force myself to cheer up with a comedy, romantic or otherwise. And I also didn't want to have to engage with something intellectually challenging or emotionally intense. And so I settled on The Founder. For better or for worse I'm generally good at gauging what I need to program for myself in a given mood so I'll keep my eyes glued to my laptop and The Founder felt like just the thing I wanted in that moment.<br />
<br />
<b>Temperature: </b>The Founder was released in December 2016 so it's not as cold of a take as some of the other movies I have planned for this series. I'd call it Lukewarm.<br />
<br />
My thoughts on the movie evolved as I watched it. At first I was just taken in by Michael Keaton's performance and the look of the film. From the first sales pitch that opens the movie, you can instantly tell that Keaton is operating on a higher level than most as an actor. He makes the kind of smart acting choices that communicate so much about the character beyond what's in the script. For example, both he and the screenwriter are aware that this is not the story of a great man or a charismatic huckster. And so time and time again, Ray fails at bamboozling his targets. He doesn't get what he wants through charm or force of personality though a movie star like Michael Keaton should be more than capable of conveying that should the role require it. Also, this is my bias, but I enjoyed the pleasantly washed out colors at the beginning of the movie. It looked like the real world. I avoid a lot of bigger movies because I just can't stand all the orange/blue high contrast and blue filters.<br />
<br />
My opinion shifted as the movie increasingly made more obvious directorial and visual storytelling choices and the script became more predictable and more of a Hollywood gloss came over the proceedings. When Ray meets the McDonald brothers for the first time the movie almost morphs into a commercial/documentary style that feels borderline cheap. But from that point on, things start to look more familiar. The color palette of the movie becomes more recognizable until the feeling that you've seen similar scenes in other movies is inescapable and that suspension of disbelief starts to dissipate. Cues that something notable is being communicated are very apparent. The movie tries its best not to knock you over the head but you can feel that it really wants to. It's hard to miss the introduction of Fred Turner. They play up every time Ray lies about his ideas for McDonald's or founding of the company. The contrast between his relationship with his wife and other marital relationships in the movie is very apparent. One of the more egregious choices is when Ray is tempted by both the wife of a franchisee and a scheme to cut costs with an inferior product. The scene ends with a close up shot of the powdered mix milkshake, framed so that you also get a direct look at the woman's cleavage. Her chest is slightly out of focus. See, subtle.<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
Speaking of the female characters in the movie, they aren't handled terribly well. Laura Dern does her best in a thankless role as Ray's wife. She's sketched in just enough to make demands but not be shrewish and to be sympathetic but not really have a significant role. As portrayed in this movie, Ethel is perhaps a little superficial. She wants to have dinner at the club and she has poor taste in friends. But she also just wants to spend time with her husband and in spite of his complaints, she does support him and try to make the effort to help him grow his business and even help him find franchisees once she realizes what he's looking for. But her efforts are never enough. It's perhaps her easy acquiescence and lack of drive that prevent him from ever seeing her as a full partner. In direct contrast to his tall, slim, and quiet wife is the previously mentioned temptation of another man's wife who is petite, curvy, and bold... but in a feminine and seductive way that doesn't challenge his dominance. She's written as a plot device, a femme fatale who doesn't scheme at the level of Lady Macbeth but does seem oddly compelled (and not rebuffed) by Ray's clear inroads into her seemingly happy marriage with the gorgeous Patrick Wilson. There's no explanation besides her heretofore untapped ambition for why she'll stay up late murmuring sweet words of encouragement to Ray over the phone like a sultrier less manic version of the modern manic pixie dream girl. Ray also has a secretary but she barely registers as a character.<br />
<br />
Another poorly written character is B.J. Novak's Harry Sonneborn who might as well actually be Mephistopheles for all it makes sense how he sweeps in to the picture and why he helps Ray pursue his business interests the way he does. His character is not particularly devious or demonic but he does enable Ray to go from making small, notably unsuccessful trespasses to finally building his empire and gaining all his heart desires. But that's what a deal with the devil can do.<br />
<br />
So... let's finally talk about McDonald's. Nick Offerman and John Carroll Lynch turn in wonderful performances as the brothers who actually opened the restaurant and, more importantly, devised a system to streamline and speed up food preparation and eliminate some of the pitfalls of drive-in model. They created the model on which franchises could be started. When I say their introduction serves as a bit of a commercial for McDonald's, I mean that the movie certainly chooses to be generous about their genius and embodiment of American values and the American dream. More time is spent on a Moneyball-style focus on numbers and mass production instead of lingering on those shots of greasy burgers and potatoes being dunked in vats of oil. The movie does argue persuasively for the convenience of the experience and the fact that it provides customers with what they want. It never explicitly condemns the fast food chain but as the business franchises expand across the country and the marketing touts home and family messaging and also proposes the idea that burgers, fries, and milkshakes are an acceptable regular diet and not an occasional indulgence, the sense of distaste is unavoidable.<br />
<br />
Ultimately, the movie falls short of what it's trying to be... which ended up being The Social Network with a Death of a Salesman twist. It shortchanges its narrative with stereotypical female characters and walks the line of being heavy-handed with scenes of Keaton clutching dirt in his fist. We wander so far from Ray's initial struggles as a mixer salesman that it's almost jarring at the end when he brings up his Slavic sounding name and his coveting of the American moniker of McDonald's (let's not get into how at that point they weren't too many decades removed from anti-Irish and anti-Scottish sentiment). Speaking of discrimination, I would be remiss if I didn't point out the lack of acknowledgement of the casual integration of the crowd scenes. This movie starts in the 50's. The movie's final scene doesn't pack an emotional punch but there's a lot to recommend it throughout, mostly to the credit of the actors and the way it stays on a pretty even keel.<br />
<br />
<b>CONCLUSION: </b>I wouldn't seek this one out. But if you're in a similar mood and looking for an unchallenging biopic that mostly avoids heavy-handed Hollywood storytelling, consider checking out The Founder. The talented cast anchors the film with very solid performances. Birdman is probably a better movie but I won't know until it's on Netflix or Amazon Prime.<br />
<br />
If you're curious about how far the movie diverges from the real life story, I found this website after I finished watching it. It's worth a quick read if you do watch the movie.<br />
<br />
http://rayandjoan.com/the-founder/</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-66884172996817916222018-01-16T17:32:00.001-05:002018-01-16T17:32:33.084-05:00New Series: Cold TakesCat here. Sorry for the unexpected hiatus. My attention was elsewhere.<br />
<br />
Much ado is made about the divided TV landscape. There are too many things to watch! Programming is targeted so specifically to individual consumer groups! We don't all gather around the TV at the same time and discuss it at the water cooler the next day! Horror of horrors.<br />
<br />
Well, sadly I don't have a solution to remedy all of that. But I do find myself watching more Netflix and Amazon Prime these days and wanting to discuss it and so we have the birth of a new series on this blog... Cold Takes.<br />
<br />
I don't know what this is going to be yet. I could be watching TV shows or movies or stand up specials. These might be formal reviews or they might just be scattered thoughts. But I will be finding these pieces of media on Amazon Prime and Netflix and I will most likely be watching things long after they're relevant to the cultural conversation. Thus... Cold Takes.<br />
<br />
<br />DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-87923106206503131202015-07-17T16:53:00.003-04:002015-07-17T16:53:34.485-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: 2016 Good TrailersHello there,<br />
<br />
Cat here. As your reward for returning we finally get to talk about the trailers that I did like. In another post we can discuss the remaining shows that didn't put out trailers. Yes, I know there was a big delay in between this post and the last few. Sorry about that.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Crazy Ex-Girlfriend (the cw)</b><br />
God bless the crazy people who haven't given up on musicals on TV. Santino Fontana is in this. Why am I even still typing? Of course, I'm watching this. I hate the name though.<br />
<br />
<b>Angel from Hell (CBS) </b><br />
I can't say that I watch a lot of CBS shows or that this looks that great to me but I can be pretty loyal. Maggie Lawson pretty much got me from Model Behavior and even though I eventually gave up on Psych (after 5 seasons you're pushing it) I'm probably always going to be interested in her next project. We've also got Liza Lapira in this who I've followed from Traffic Light to Don't Trust the B in Apt 23 to Super Fun Night. You're great, Liza Lapira. Please find a show that doesn't get cancelled after a season. There's also Kyle Bornheimer from Perfect Couples and a brief stint on Agent Carter. And of course, Jane Lynch. I watched all six seasons of Glee and I love Hollywood Game Night though her banter on that show is awful. I don't see this show having a long life but I'll probably tune in as long as it's on the air.<br />
<br />
<b>Supergirl (CBS) </b><br />
So opinions are divided on Supergirl. Again, I'm very biased. I have no attachment to the character or the canon but I like too many of the people involved in this show to not watch. It feels like even more of a girl power show than Agent Carter and I'm not as put off by the supposed gendered storytelling. We'll see where they go with it. I mean, let's not pretend that Smallville, Arrow, and The Flash don't spend a fair amount of their running times on romantic foibles and somewhat frivolous concerns. We have Melissa Benoist, who was bland but relatively charming as Marley on Glee, the goddess Laura Benanti, and the fabulously talented and most likely to be wasted in this <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TppJMa8apkc">Jeremy Jordan</a>. They've also included Mehcad Brooks (The Deep End), Chyler Leigh (Not Another Teen Movie), and David Harewood (Selfie). The only cast member who is really throwing me off is Calista Flockhart. I'm really not sold on that character at all.<br />
<br />
<b>The Grinder (FOX)</b><br />
The trailer made me chuckle which is more than I can say for a lot of comedic trailers. The cast is solid and I like the guest stars/character actors. I'm in.<br />
<br />
<b>Wicked City (ABC)</b><br />
Look, I watched every episode of Gossip Girl. #ChairForever. As soon as I saw Ed Westwick, I knew I was going to watch this show. He looks like he's doing a great job in this. I'm really not into the idea of another show with vulnerable women being murdered all over the place but I will give it a chance for him.<br />
<br />
<b>Best Time Ever with NPH</b><br />
I have absolutely no idea what to expect from this but I will give it a shot. Will it be Maya Rudolph's show or another Hollywood Game Night? Again, who knows?<br />
<br />
<b>Minority Report (FOX)</b><br />
This reminds me of Person of Interest and maybe a little bit of The Flash and you know, just a lot of other shows. That said, of the high concept show trailers that were released for this kind of show, this is the one that jumped out at me the most. Also, I like the team aspect. One day I will find my next Leverage. One day.<br />
<br />
<b>Lucifer (FOX) </b><br />
I cannot justify this one at all but I was kind of into this trailer. The leading man seems charming enough. I don't mind supernatural shenanigans on similar shows like Reaper or Deadbeat or Charmed. I don't like that it seems like another crime solving show with a Brit but yeah, I liked this trailer.<br />
<br />DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-40960510421678567902015-06-03T18:07:00.001-04:002015-06-03T18:07:26.561-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: UnRealHello there,<br />
<br />
Cat here. Let's talk about UnReal. Yes, I know it usually takes me ages to talk about a pilot now but the ratings for UnReal weren't great (not that the hits for this blog are fantastic either) and I want to see this series through to the end. A bit of background first. I haven't watched that much of The Bachelor/The Bachelorette. I can't remember watching any of The Bachelor actually. I tried to watch some of last season (Andi's season) of The Bachelorette but I quickly became bored and hated everyone too much and got distracted by other things. What I have watched is every available episode of Burning Love and a lot of other terrible dating reality shows so I do have some inkling of what's being satirized and analyzed here.<br />
<br />
UnReal, in case you were one of the under a million people who caught the pilot, is a show about the world behind the scenes of a show called Everlasting. It's pretty much The Bachelor but with even more emphasis on the fairytale romance. The Bachelor doesn't try this hard. So I guess more like "I Want to Marry Harry" if they took it seriously? I don't know. The series seems like it's going to focus on Shiri Appleby's (Dating Rules From My Future Self) character Rachel Goldberg but there's a nice ensemble dynamic happening. There's a lot of shorthand in the pilot but I'm willing to move past that as long as they find the depth in the characters during the rest of the season. Right now, Appleby makes the show. I can't remember seeing a female character like this for a long time... maybe ever. She's almost the opposite of most male antiheroes/geniuses who are running around solving crimes and diagnosing illnesses. She's smart and warm and empathetic and she's using her powers for evil. She feels bad about it but there's still a ruthless streak in her that's very compelling. She does drink a bit in the pilot but so far we've gotten no sign that she can't handle herself (in spite of her having to ask her boss to sign something saying she was sober and showed up to work on time). It's what she has to do at work that's actually taking a toll on her physical and mental well-being.<br />
<br />
Other than the fantastic casting of Shiri Appleby, I think the best part of the pilot was the behind the scenes machinations. I came into the show expecting soapy trash. The kind of fix you get from Empire or Devious Maids. UnReal tries for that a bit but I don't think the humor or the dysfunction quite lands because you're held at such a distance from the action. You're not watching The Bachelor. You're watching The Bachelor sometimes two or three steps removed as the people in the control room watch Rachel watch the contestants. No, what's most interesting is not the tough-talking boss who is being played a little too over the top right now. It's seeing how the pieces are choreographed and coordinated and seeing those final pushes from Rachel that seal the deal.<br />
<br />
Of course I do still have concerns. I'm hoping the show doesn't play too much into cliches and stereotypes. In addition to the unnecessarily brash boss who's secretly caring we have a workplace rival who can't match up and a quiet intern who they lingered on way too many times for her not to be important in the future. Even then I'm encouraged by the diversity of this cast in terms of gender, ethnicity, and age and the fact that they tackled the lack of the diversity on The Bachelor franchises in one of the first lines of the show. My other big concern is avoiding a romance, unrequited or mutual between Rachel and Adam Cromwell, the bachelor character. I can feel them pulling in that direction and I really wish they wouldn't.<br />
<br />
<b>CONCLUSION: </b>Watch this show. This was a very solid pilot. I think it's a show with something interesting to say. It falls into that nice middle ground between a show that tries so hard to shock you that you're left with a ton of filler episodes and a show that never shoots for the fences but puts out a consistent product... that you can skip for a bunch of episodes and not really miss. I can't sell it any more just from the pilot but I have faith in it.DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-43877702299880489042015-05-27T02:13:00.002-04:002015-05-27T02:13:48.485-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: 2016 Meh TrailersHello!<br />
<br />
So you came back. Yes, we're continuing to analyze the trailers for the 2016 TV pilot season. This round is a kind of nebulous grouping of all the shows that fall in the middle. The trailers weren't so boring or uninformative that I completely wrote them off but they also weren't enough to guarantee that I'd watch the show. There were things in all of these trailers that I liked. And also things that I didn't.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Quantico (ABC)</b><br />
So I know I rejected Code Black which is a similar shows about a group of newbies plunged into a competitive environment, blah blah, formula. There's something about this ensemble show that grabbed me a little more. Maybe it's just that it's not in a hospital. Granted, there's not a lot that I'm drawn to right now but if it's done well, I could see myself liking this one. Certainly more than Covert Affairs.<br />
<br />
<b>Scream Queens (FOX)</b><br />
So the good news, at least for me, and you if you like reading my thoughts on TV shows, is that the horror doesn't seem gory enough to make this a hard pass. It feels more like Pretty Little Liars than American Horror Story. The bad news is that this trailer was not that impressive and there's a lot of, erp, not quite A level talent, that are making me question the quality of this project. Oliver Hudson from Nashville? Nasim Pedrad? All the stunt casting? Why is Lea Michele in headgear?<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>The Real O'Neals (ABC)</b><br />
I'm cautiously optimistic about this one. I won't jump to saying it as good as the family comedies that ABC delivered last season but it feels like one of the better family comedies... maybe one of the ones I never watched like The Middle or Raising Hope. Were those good? Obviously I don't know.<br />
<br />
<b>Uncle Buck (ABC)</b><br />
This trailer was fine. I don't think I'll get far past the first few episodes but it seems like a decent TV movie or a lower tier feature.<br />
<br />
<b>Life in Pieces (CBS)</b><br />
They put together a good cast including Zoe Lister Jones (Whitney), Colin Hanks, James Brolin, and Dianne Wiest. Yes, I watched Whitney. Don't judge me. This is what I imagine Parenthood was like never having watched it. I don't think I'll watch this show either.<br />
<br />
<b>Of Kings and Prophets (ABC)</b><br />
I'm not a big fan of Biblical dramas and I still haven't watched Rome or Game of Thrones, epic ensemble dramas in this vein. Nothing in the acting or story I can see in the trailer is compelling to me. So why is this in the "meh" group? Look, this could very well be that ancient Egyptian (?) show from last season that they cancelled before it even aired. But it does look like they spent the money to bring a pay cable style epic ensemble drama to network so I'm at least a little interested.<br />
<br />
<b>The Player (NBC)</b><br />
Why isn't this show about Wesley Snipes? If this show was just about Wesley Snipes I would have put it in the good category. It's not even about a team including Wesley Snipes and that lady with an accent. Instead it's about another capable white guy and his dead prop wife and... nope. It looks good for what it is but what it is isn't a show I'm going to watch.<br />
<br />
<b>DC's Legends of Tomorrow (CW)</b><br />
There was no way I was going to watch Arrow but I fully intended to cover at least the trailer for The Flash. It got away from me. I saw it. My general impression was... this is very conventional and somewhat lacking in depth and heart. Legends of Tomorrow looks like more of the same except I do like the fact that there's a clear team and not just a star and all his sidekicks. My heart hasn't forgotten Leverage and apparently I haven't lost hope that I'll find another team show again. I got my hopes up for Alphas but that didn't pan out. And it's nice to see a team with diversity in terms of ethnicity, gender, and age (shout out to Victor Garber). I will try to cover the pilot but I doubt that it'll be a show I keep up with.<br />
<br />
<b>The Frankenstein Code (FOX) </b><br />
Is it wrong that I don't hate this? I feel like I should hate this. That's not to say that I like it either but yeah, I could watch it.<br />
<br />
<b>Heartbreaker (NBC)</b><br />
This is another perfectly fine trailer. It doesn't look awful. I'm sure someone will like it. But I've definitely seen this show before and I'm not interested in watching it again.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Grandfathered (FOX)</b><br />
I think I like Josh Peck and John Stamos but this premise is entirely uninteresting to me. Otherwise, it was a decent trailer.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Rosewood (FOX)</b><br />
These crime-fighting male-female team-ups live and die on the actors they cast and I'm not feeling it from the trailer. </div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-43874209474700068522015-05-21T16:47:00.001-04:002015-05-21T16:47:11.672-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: 2016 Bad TrailersHi there,<br />
<br />
Cat here. No idea why you're still with me on this weird diversion we've been taking for much longer than I thought we would but I'm glad you're here. Like the misguided Married at First Sight, we're going to be taking another crack at analyzing pilot season for 2016 so let's take a look at the shows that may or may not be occupying our time. I'm getting the bad news out of the way first by starting with the trailers for shows I will most likely not watch, at least past the pilot.<br />
<br />
<b>Blindspot (NBC)</b><br />
Based on her role in Kyle XY, Jaimie Alexander seems to be perfect casting for this show. That said, I'm not excited by the idea of this completely objected nonperson female protagonist. However, Agent Carter made me realize I might be more into fight sequences that I thought I was so I will at least watch the pilot for this.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Code Black (CBS)</b><br />
This show doesn't look terrible at all. It just looks very, very boring. Marcia Gay Harden has not grabbed me with her presence in the last two shows I've seen her in, Trophy Wife and How to Get Away with Murder, and yet she's the strongest member of the cast from the trailer and that has me worried. I've also just found it difficult to care about medical dramas since House ended. Luis Guzman is an interesting addition but Octavia Spencer wasn't enough to get me past the first dreadful episode of Red Band Society so I don't imagine he'll do much better. Plus, we've got Raza Jaffrey who I'll contend ruined the first season of Smash more Katharine McPhee. Yeah, I said it. I may watch the pilot if I have the time.<br />
<br />
<b>Containment (The cw)</b><br />
This show doesn't look bad. Actually the quality seems rather good for the cw. Or at least the cw before all the DC comics properties. I'm just not interested in this show at all. I also didn't watch that Contagion movie. There's a reason why Titanic was successful. There are too many people in this trailer and I don't care about any of them. I have no idea where this show is going. Are they just going to force you to watch large-scale human suffering every week? Sure, that sounds fun.<br />
<br />
<b>Limitless (CBS)</b><br />
I did not watch the movie with Bradley Cooper though it looked better than this. This started off annoying with the same goddamned voiceover that plagued me throughout the 2015 pilot season and then quickly became the same procedural where a male and female lead solve crimes. I need really compelling actors if I'm going to sit through that again and I don't think Jake McDorman (Manhattan Love Story) and Jennifer Carpenter (Dexter) are those actors.<br />
<br />
<b>The Family (ABC)</b><br />
What is with all these bland titles? I know it worked for Friends but do you want it to be impossible for your show? Are you just counting down the days until it gets cancelled? I was burned by that Impostor documentary, which you absolutely should not watch, and I just don't find these kinds of things compelling. It's nice to see Allison Pill and Andrew MacCarthy and Liam James (Psych) but I don't like any of them enough to suffer through this.<br />
<br />
<b>The Catch (ABC)</b><br />
I wasn't grabbed by the acting in the trailer. I don't really care about the mystery. And I was burned by my first Shonda show, How to Get Away With Murder. I'll pass.<br />
<br />
<b>Dr. Ken (ABC)</b><br />
I don't hate sitcoms. Last season ABC did well with Blackish, Fresh Off the Boat, and Cristela. But I'm not just going to watch a show for the sake of supporting diversity if the show's not any good. This show seems to lack the heart, solid acting, and writing of those other comedies. You have Ken Jeong (Community), Dave Foley, Tisha Campbell-Martin (My Wife and Kids), Suzy Nakamura (Go On), and Albert Tsai (Trophy Wife, Fresh Off the Boat) who I've liked in other things but I don't know if I'll even watch the pilot.<br />
<br />
<b>The Muppets (ABC)</b><br />
I'm certainly not saying this show will be terrible. What I'm saying is that as a non-fan this trailer did nothing to sell me on the show.<br />
<br />
<b>Oil (ABC)</b><br />
The premise and the world of the show do not appeal to me. I didn't watch the original Dallas and I didn't watch it when it came back on TNT. Also as a loyal viewer of Gossip Girl I have absolutely zero faith in Chace Crawford's ability to carry a show.<br />
<br />
<b>Heroes Reborn (NBC)</b><br />
I did not watch Heroes when it originally aired and while I do like Zachary Levi I did give up on Chuck a season or two before it was cancelled. The trailer gave me nothing to go on. I will probably pass on this.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>People Are Talking (NBC)</b><br />
I'm not sure if the situation in the trailer is just limited to the pilot or if that's supposed to be the premise for the entire show. Regardless, while this wasn't awful, there was nothing here that made me want to watch this show. It's another bland comedy that will either be cancelled immediately or amaze me when I realize it's still on the air in a couple of years. It does have Mark Paul Gosselaar in it but then so did Franklin and Bash.<br />
<br />
<b>Bordertown (FOX)</b><br />
NOPE.<br />
<br />DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-49832324867802208492015-04-07T21:06:00.002-04:002015-04-07T21:06:46.279-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Backstrom<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hello!<br />
<br />
Cat here. Yes, I'm just racing through these today. I forgot about Backstrom. I think I'd convinced myself that I'd already written this post. I was looking forward to this show since I saw the trailer and yeah, I like it. I missed having a procedural in my life. House has ended. Psych has ended. I think Burn Notice has ended but I just stopped watching one day and never looked back so I can't be sure. I can't watch Bones anymore. It's too dumb. I tried, probably two or three seasons longer than I should have, but I can't watch that show anymore. Castle is alright but it's not a show I want to watch every week. And there are only so many Law and Order reruns you can watch. Backstrom fills that void for me.<br />
<br />
There's not that much to say about it. It's a fine little procedural in the vein of all the other special, quirky dudes solving crime or illnesses with their unique brand of snark and insight. You know what you're getting into when you turn one of these shows on. On a positive note for Backstrom, I actually like the rest of the ensemble. I think the weakness of the show is when it wants to get too serious. Everything with Backstrom's back story and those little close-ups of Rainn Wilson... "feeling" things really deeply are just... Yeah, it's sweet that they're trying to go there but it doesn't work.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>CONCLUSION:</b> Do you need to watch Backstrom? No. But if, like me, you're looking for a procedural to fill that void... maybe check it out. You could certainly do worse.</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-65195356675710137582015-04-07T20:55:00.000-04:002015-04-07T20:55:10.445-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: The Grace Helbig ShowHi there,<br />
<br />
Cat here. I'm going to keep this one short. I'm a fan of itsgrace on youtube. I wanted to like this show. I did not like this show. It feels incredibly awkward... in a bad way, like they haven't been able to capture what makes Grace so funny. The camera feels like it's at a remove. The format does not feel strong at this point and I hope these aren't permanent segments. The monologue, Deal... it feels forced. And also like a long livestream where they're just throwing things at the wall. Her podcast is great. You should listen to it if you haven't done so already. Her book is alright but not really that funny. If you're looking for a good memoir, I suggest Let's Pretend This Never Happened by Jenny Lawson instead.<br />
<br />
<b>CONCLUSION:</b> I will keep watching. Of course I'm going to keep watching. I'm hoping they'll find their footing soon. You probably shouldn't watch until they do.<br />
<br />
<br />DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-35406611444387284032015-04-07T20:49:00.000-04:002015-04-07T20:49:02.501-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: The Nightly Show With Larry WilmoreHello internet,<br />
<br />
This seems like an odd show to underthink as we've been talking about narrative fiction shows so far but I decided to throw it in the mix anyway. We've already talked about Blackish, which Larry Wilmore was involved with, and it is a new show that premiered this season and you know what, look, this is my blog, well, our blog (Hi Gab!), and we're going to talk about what we want to talk about.<br />
<br />
I've watched almost all of the 35 episodes that have aired at this point. I may have missed five or fewer episodes because I didn't have enough time to watch them and they just expired from my hulu queue. Regardless of the exact number, I feel like I have a good grasp of the show at this point. The decision to go with the panel show was an interesting choice but it's ultimately a big weakness. Even on Fox News, the panel show format, not the shows with the talking heads but the ones on Fox News or Fox Business where people just hang out and talk, are the worst. They might actually contain fewer inflammatory ideas and comments and foster a real discussion but they are generally quite boring. And when people want to talk over each other or get in their soundbytes, things become a bit of a mess and there's no depth to the discussion.<br />
<br />
I admire the fact that The Nightly Show isn't afraid of tackling big ideas but I don't think this is the right format to do it. Last Week Tonight with John Oliver is just a superior show. For me, it's the news show that inherits the mantle of Stewart and Colbert and pushes farther into tackling big issues and provoking change. For the most part, I just don't find The Nightly Show that consistently funny and the panelists rarely delve deeply into the subjects they tackle and make any original salient points.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>CONCLUSION: </b>This isn't a show you need to watch but if there's a topic that interests you maybe tune in once in a while. You may get a laugh or two out of it but you probably won't learn anything and it'll likely just reinforce the viewpoint you already hold.<br />
<br />
<br />DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-75763136652791594642015-03-17T18:54:00.001-04:002015-03-17T18:54:25.518-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Marvel's Agent Carter<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hello there,<br />
<br />
Cat here. I know, I know. I am super behind on this. At this point I've already seen the entire first season of Marvel's Agent Carter and I'm sure you have as well if you had any interest in the show. But let's just go ahead and talk about it anyway. The best way I can explain my experience watching the show was that the things that I thought would appeal to me didn't, but I still found a lot to enjoy about it.<br />
<br />
It is still so difficult to write good female characters for some reason that it seems that many times people just stumble into a good female character without that being their main goal. I think that might be why there are often more compelling female characters in ensemble shows or in the background than female leads. It gets very tricky and the dearth of well-written female characters results in an incredible pressure on a show that decides to have a single female protagonist, never mind one with a so called "feminist agenda."<br />
<br />
So yes, I could pick this pilot apart. I could point out that it starts with establishing Peggy Carter as a character in relation to Captain America and with her uttering the lines "I'll get Howard on the line. He'll know what to do." The hero makes a brave, self-sacrificing choice while the heroine is helpless to stop him or to help. But over the course of the series, we see this moment as the anomaly. Usually. Although it never stretches believability in Agent Carter, having such a capable character can be a bit boring. After a while it's not as a exciting to watch a show where the doctor, lawyer, detective, etc. is going to be able to resolve the problem within the hour. Having the series start with this moment which stands in stark contrast to the rest of Peggy's adventures makes her successes somehow more satisfying. We've already seen her fail.<br />
<br />
So what was it that I expected to be drawn to that let me down? Well, after two or three episodes, you stop caring but this is really not a period show. The costumes are... fine, but did nothing to place me in the era. There's something about the entire world that feels like they were trying but didn't really succeed. I don't know if it was a budget issue or an attempt to recreate the comics or just a lack of research and imagination but I always had that sense of remove. And, oh, the accents. I don't know if it was worse when people were trying or when they weren't. I'm looking at you Chad Michael Murray. The dialogue didn't always help. Again, I wasn't sure if it was worse when it sounded completely modern or when they forced period slang.<br />
<br />
My other issue was the female empowerment angle. Throughout the series, I feel like they failed time and time again at portraying sexism. It was just so overt. And yet still not that offensive. It was an odd middle ground where they seemed too afraid to show characters act truly reprehensibly and yet too afraid that more subtle forms of sexism would be missed by the audience. The show asks us to have sympathy for pretty much all of the other agents with speaking parts who display sexist behaviors or attitudes so I understand not wanting to make them unlikable but it ended up feeling so awkward and undercutting whatever message they were trying to get across.<br />
<br />
There were some fun gadgets in the pilot. I wish there'd been more of those throughout the series instead of Howard Stark's weapon of the week.<br />
<br />
So now let's talk about what I did enjoy. The show is very easily digestible. It has a decent blend of the procedural and the overarching story line which made it compelling from episode to episode. And as someone who pretty much ignores most action and crime films, it was unexpectedly satisfying to watch the fight scenes in Agent Carter. I'm far from an expert on fight choreography but I think Hayley Atwell and whoever directed those scenes did a brilliant job making them exciting to watch and believable.<br />
<br />
<b>CONCLUSION:</b> I feel like I rambled quite a bit with this one but here are my final thoughts. It's not a perfect show. It wasn't the period piece I wanted it to be and it bungled the feminism but I found it pretty entertaining and I would absolutely watch a second season. They'll have to work harder to make me actually emotionally invest in any of these characters but it has a lot of potential as a spy show.</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-45276824395745709982015-02-09T23:39:00.000-05:002015-03-17T18:17:10.084-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Empire<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hello everyone,<br />
<br />
Cat here. Put music in your show and I will watch it. Glee. Smash. Nashville. Galavant. But unlike the creators of those properties, I understand that those shows aren't meant for everyone. But then there's Empire.<br />
<br />
Guys, if you're not watching Empire... why are you not watching Empire? It is delicious, soapy goodness with musical breaks and I can't get enough of it.<br />
<br />
Sure, not everything makes sense. There's that nonsense Lucious spouted about the internet and disenfranchised youths when the internet has lowered the barrier to entry for the music business and allowed smaller artists and unrepresented artists to reach a larger public than they would have been able to without it. There's no good reason why he has to groom one son to be his successor instead of having them work together. King Lear had three <i>daughters</i>.<br />
<br />
But if you can watch this show and not get taken in by Terrence Howard's and Taraji P. Henson's performances, I don't know if we can be friends. Taraji in particular is amazing. Not that the show needs carrying but let's just say she's ready and able to shoulder the burden should she need to. Beyond that, Cookie is still a very interesting character. She's not politically correct at all but at her core, she's a good person. And don't think I missed her shout out to one of (I think) the only two women in that boardroom. I see you, Empire. I see you.<br />
<br />
While I think the family dynamics are the strongest part of the show I would like to learn more about Tiana and they really need to do something about how they're writing Andre's wife because none of that makes even an ounce of sense.<br />
<br />
<b>CONCLUSION:</b> Watch Empire. I'm going to. At this point in the series I don't care that much about any of the sons and there's a whole boatload of craziness happening but I will continue watching to see what they pile on next. You should too. </div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-53915879753777024872015-02-09T22:12:00.003-05:002015-02-09T22:12:39.377-05:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Marry Me<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hi guys,<br />
<br />
Cat here. Continuing on with my effort to just plow through a bunch of these posts, let's talk about Marry Me. I like Casey Wilson. Happy Endings was great. The Hotwives of Orlando was occasionally amusing. I like Ken Marino (Reaper, Burning Love). I should like this show, right?<br />
<br />
Well, at the start, I didn't. I didn't hate the show but it was feeling a little forced. I was hyper aware that the show was a show. I didn't connect with the characters because it felt like one long sketch or a game of how fast people could deliver their dialogue. Honestly, I felt like I was drowning in banter.<br />
<br />
However, as the pilot went on the laughs picked up. The jokes are there and the line delivery is great. Having now watched more episodes, the characters are growing on me though I still feel that sense of remove. They feel more like actors than people and in going for a laugh you sacrifice a lot of emotional depth. So while I don't really care about the characters that much even now, it is an enjoyable little half hour show.<br />
<br />
Lastly, tell me the Kevin's are not how they should have written Rachel's dads on Glee.<br />
<br />
<b>CONCLUSION:</b> Give it a chance for a few episodes. If it doesn't win you over, it just might not be for you. It's pleasant and funny and diverting but not a must watch.<br />
<br /></div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-48602381926276214302015-02-09T22:02:00.001-05:002015-02-09T22:02:19.320-05:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Red Band Society<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hi there,<br />
<br />
Cat here. I've had a bunch of notes cooling in drafts for different shows and it's time to speed through them. We might as well start with Red Band Society since it's been cancelled. Spoilers for the pilot ahead.<br />
<br />
The first strike against RBS was the voiceover. I eventually got used to it on Blackish, Selfie, Manhattan Love Story, and A to Z but enough already. And now it's on Fresh Off the Boat. Who came up with this infuriating trend for this TV season? Red Band Society is without a doubt the worst offender though since the narrator here is the kid in a coma. It also stretches believability to have him as the narrator because even with him overhearing things in his room and the other characters talking to him, he would not know this much about everything happening in the hospital.<br />
<br />
There's a level of ridiculousness here but it's less Glee and more Juno and I don't mean that as a compliment in spite of how you might feel about those respective properties. The dialogue is terrible and I don't know where this hospital is that has a giant school room with all of these students who I guess are at relatively the same learning level. The characters are ridiculous and not in an appealing way.<br />
<br />
Overall, I didn't find the pilot funny at all and none of the characters (except for Octavia Spencer's nurse character) made me want to watch another episode.<br />
<br />
And now for a list of times RBS seemed to want me to hate it.<br />
<br />
<ul style="text-align: left;">
<li>"Shouldn't we call 911?" "Not til I post this on Instagram." </li>
<li>when the cheerleader visited the coma kid in the "in between" world</li>
<li>the mindbogglingly terrible metaphor of the cheerleader having an enlarged heart and needing a heart transplant</li>
<li>the textbook characterization of the girl with the eating disorder</li>
<li>the time the cheerleader said "cray cray" unironically</li>
<li>the probable love square</li>
</ul>
</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-57033363624920081912015-02-06T02:46:00.001-05:002015-02-06T02:57:47.403-05:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Fresh Off the Boat<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hello lovely readers,<br />
<br />
Did you miss me? I've been around. Not on this blog, but I've been around. I could tell you what I thought of Galavant but that can always be a post for another day (maybe if it gets a second season). I was recapping it for another site and I had enough of it without trying to review the pilot here. Suffice it to say I don't think they really did right by their female characters and I place a lot of the blame for the lackluster quality of the show at Glenn Slater's door because I think stronger lyrics would have helped a lot.<br />
<br />
Now, on to Fresh Off The Boat. It worries me a little that they aired the first two episodes back to back in Galavant fashion. This isn't The Quest. You should not be trying to burn off episodes as quickly as possible. And furthermore, it's not necessary because this show is fantastic. It does not reinvent the wheel as far as family sitcoms go. And the comparisons to Blackish are fair. It's another smart, funny family sitcom that deals with racial issues. And I'm totally cool with that. I'm still watching Blackish and I will keep watching Fresh Off the Boat every week until/unless they take it off the air. Now, I don't think this show deserves to get cancelled but the majority of shows I love don't have a long shelf life, or at least spend that air time scrabbling to stay on the air.<br />
<br />
I understand that the focus right now is on Eddie and his father. They are the two main characters who have the strongest motivations and the clearest goals right now so it makes sense that their stories are dominant. But I would love to eventually see more meaningful input from the female characters whether that's Eddie's grandmother or other students in school or easily one of my new favorite characters on television, Jessica Huang. Constance Wu is everything. Her favorite song is Something To Talk About by Bonnie Raitt. <i>Yes.</i> If I were younger and watching this show, Jessica/Constance would totally be one of my role models along with Lea Salonga for whom I harbor a deep-seated adoration. In two episodes she is already a strong, complex human character who is well written and well acted. And if that weren't enough, she gets to be funny. She's not an utterly ridiculous clown and she's not the straight man. Instead she's given a part that I can only describe as one that you'd expect a male character to have on any show where the actress wasn't also involved in the development process.<br />
<br />
<b>Conclusion: </b>Needless to say I highly recommend checking this show out and supporting it. It might not rock your world but it has a strong, coherent voice and unlike many of the comedies we've gotten this season, it manages to be consistently funny. ABC might have failed on the rom-com revolution (though I did watch the entire seasons of Manhattan Love Story... it got better and Selfie... it was amazing and I hate them for cancelling it) but they are knocking it out of the park with their family comedies.</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-82285480932835067302014-11-16T00:31:00.000-05:002014-11-16T00:31:34.518-05:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Black-ish<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here. I just found out that Selfie has probably been cancelled so I'm not in a great mood. If I genuinely like a television show it's a good sign that it's not built to last. I'm amazed The Mindy Project and Nashville have made it this long. Suburgatory? Pushing Daisies? And yet they renewed Stalker and Scorpion. <i>I have no words.</i><br />
<br />
Let's turn our attention to an ABC that is still on the air... Black-ish. The show shares this fall season's odd obsession with voice-over and the family comedy isn't that unique but I did enjoy the pilot. Anthony Anderson appears to have woken up after sleepwalking through some recent past roles and Laurence Fishburne's presence is very much appreciated. I know his character needs to be used sparingly but I can't help wishing he had a bigger part on the show. His line delivery is just spot on sometimes. I'm not completely sold on the rest of the cast but I think that will come with time, particularly with the child actors. Tracee Ellis Ross is also doing a pretty good job anchoring the show.<br />
<br />
As I've mentioned before, with all the awkwardly constructed pilots I've been watching, it's nice to see something competent. The pilot feels slick. The writing is solid. Even though the cast hasn't established the dynamic of a long running family sitcom, you feel like they could get there.<br />
<br />
And you have to love a show with an unusual title than manages to get the title into the dialogue.<br />
<i><br /></i>
<i>"I may have to be 'urban' at work but I'm still going to need my family to be black, not black-ish, but black."</i><br />
<br />
Finally, I liked that it was a show that had something to say even if I didn't always agree its sentiments or the way they were stated. Some quotes...<br />
<br />
<a name='more'></a><br />
"The only problem is... whatever American had this dream probably wasn't from where I'm from."<br />
<br />
"Sometimes I worry that in an effort to make it, black folks have dropped a little bit of their culture and the rest of the world has picked it up. They even renamed it 'urban'."<br />
<br />
"And not that I want to go back to the days of being the big scary black guy but I have to admit, it did kind of have its advantages."<br />
<br />
"At Stevens and Leto there was a clear separation between lower (diverse) management and upper (not so much) management. And that always made me feel like it was us vs. them."<br />
<br />
"I said I wanted to be the first black SVP for Stevens and Leto when actually I wanted to be the first SVP who happened to be black."<br />
<br />
"From here on out I'm going to need you two to describe people using 'keeping it real' identifications. The assailant was a Hispanic male between the ages of 10 and 60. See, now I know who I'm looking for."<br />
<br />
"Andre, what is this mess you doing?"<br />
"This ain't no mess, pops. This is our culture."<br />
"This ain't our culture. We black not African. Africans don't even like us."<br />
<br />
"You're upset because they gave you the job because you're black. If they'd given it to someone white, you'd be upset they didn't give it to someone black! This keeping it real BS has got to stop. I'm not going to have you running around torturing my son."<br />
<br />
"Dad, listen, I get it. You feel like I'm turning into a white boy. But I'm not. I'm just being me. I'm just not quite sure who that is yet."<br />
<br />
"Field hockey? Man, isn't that a woman's sport?"<br />
"Nope. A lot of people think that though."<br />
"A lot of people never think about field hockey, man."<br />
<br />
"All this coming from a biracial or mixed or omni-colored complexion, whatever they're calling it today woman, who technically isn't even really black?"</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-28373335787272607192014-11-13T00:16:00.000-05:002015-03-17T18:17:47.940-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Cristela<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here with another short review. Cristela is <i>very</i> sitcom-y. I haven't watched a show like this in years and even then I was usually watching them in re-runs or late at night with nothing better to watch. This was before hulu and getting a DVR. It was a dark time. Anyway, I think the cast is totally solid and the jokes are actually pretty good. For me, the humor doesn't always land because of the format. I've never seen her stand-up but in this pilot I can clearly see how those jokes would have worked better in the context of a stand-up act. They lose something in being performed by the characters. However, Cristela is very winning and charming as a leading lady and she carries the show effortlessly. It's an ensemble but she's got a star quality as opposed to other shows where the lead just gets all the best jokes.<br />
<br />
I would like to give a shout out to two other things in this pilot. Firstly, I appreciated that they used Spanish in a casual, natural way but didn't feel obligated to explain it to an English-speaking audience. I took French in high school but the Spanish never made the show feel inaccessible to me. Secondly, I liked the small subplot about Cristela's niece wanting to play soccer instead of being a cheerleader. Now I do think that competitive cheerleading is a dangerous sport that takes hard work and skill and many of the other positive attributes you would want to foster in children with extracurricular activities. However, the show framed it nicely in this quote.<br />
<br />
"I can't believe it. Today my little girl's going to be a cheerleader."<br />
"Ah, yes. The great Texas tradition where girls learn they're not quite as important as boys."<br />
<br />
<b>Final Conclusion: </b>This is not a must watch. If you enjoy sitcoms or you can at least tolerate a new one, this is an enjoyable way to spend a half hour. I'm interested to hear what she has to say but the sitcom format is personally holding me back from loving this show. But I'll stick with it for a while.</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-74826586919562197272014-11-05T22:01:00.000-05:002014-11-05T22:01:01.563-05:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Selfie<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here. Guys, I think I finally found a show that I really like. I know it's silly and it's not perfect but it makes me laugh. And when it's not making me laugh, it makes me smile. Though I was not into the voice-over. Enough, fall TV season. Enough with the voice-over.<br />
<br />
For one thing, it was just a well constructed half hour pilot.<br />
<br />
"Being butt ugly wasn't what I wanted to be noticed for... so I took a lesson from the most popular girl in 7th grade. It took me 14 years to perfect it but now, I was insta-famous."<br />
<br />
Done and done. How hard was that, other pilots? The way she has her moment of crisis and comes to the realization that she needs Henry to help her feels natural.<br />
<br />
For another, the show actually bothered to sell us on the protagonist. We're told early on that she's the company's best performing sales rep so we know we're working with some level of competence. She's intensely flawed but not detestable. I feel like a lot of shows go overboard with making the characters vile or incompetent for the sake of shock value or humor and then have a hard time reining it back in to make us care about them as human beings. Sure, Eliza's a little vapid and clueless but she was horrified to learn that the man she was interested in was married. She doesn't completely fall apart in a bad situation but she doesn't recover flawlessly either. Her credit cards are maxed, she's keeping the litter box of a cat that died six months ago and she forgot to throw out some old lo mein but she isn't so ridiculous that I can't see her as a human being. She interrupts a wedding by playing on her phone. She doesn't do something so heinous that we wonder why no one cuts her out of their life. Overall, I just feel like there's a nice balance. There's someone in the driver's seat who knows what they're doing and that's reassuring.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
As for John Cho, the last two things I saw him in were Go On and Sleepy Hollow back when I was still watching Sleepy Hollow. I watched all of Go On. It was great. Anyway, he seems so much more awake and present here. I'm glad to see him engaged in a role again.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
Now obviously the show is called Selfie and the main character is obsessed with social media so a lot of that is presented onscreen. I think it's a little hit or miss. There are parts of it that I like and times when it is less successful. I thought the gifs were cute but I don't need things constantly flashing on screen.<br />
<br />
Finally, I will admit that a lot of my love for this show is probably residual Suburgatory fandom. I'm used to the creator's voice and rhythms and characters. We have yet another ginger leading lady and I'm accustomed to the way the characters talk and the timing of the jokes. There are shades of particularly Dahlia and Lisa in the characters of Eliza and Brynn.<br />
<b><br /></b>
<b>Final Conclusion:</b> I have great hopes for this show. I think it is funny and charming and exactly what I want from a half hour comedy. If you like Suburgatory and The Mindy Project and maybe just a touch of Don't Trust the B in Apartment 23, I think you'll enjoy this show as much as I did. If you can't stand the protagonist after the pilot, the show's just not for you and there's nothing wrong with that. I'll just be over here enjoying a show that plays The Weepies. </div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-40823291997922403362014-11-04T02:14:00.001-05:002014-11-04T02:14:48.305-05:00Underthinking Pilot Season: A to Z<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Hi guys,<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Cat here. I remember A to Z being a very highly anticipated show. Now it's apparently not doing so well. Or so I hear. I could be wrong about that. There's only so much television criticism a person can read. But I do love romantic comedies and Ben Feldman has a giant bucket of goodwill from Drop Dead Diva so let's get started.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
"Let me tell you the story of a couple. One of the greats."</div>
<div>
I do NOT get the obsession with voice overs this pilot season. However "let" is a nice choice of phrasing. It sort of asks for permission while being firm enough to be begging. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I am a sucker for singing. And Celine Dion. Do not judge me. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I feel like the idea that his mother died when he was young and so he held his parents up as a perfect couple doesn't make much sense. I forget the proper logic terms but I don't think one really follows from the other. Overall, I think the script feels oddly sparse. They're taking way too much time with their words for a half hour show and the words they are speaking are not that compelling.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I'm sorry. I hear Katie Sagal's disembodied voice and I think of Pat from Smart House. This is creating the feeling that the characters are little dolls and a god or some genius computer is controlling them... which doesn't really help with the whole connecting to the characters as real people thing. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
There were some complaints about the guy's guy/girl's girl thing but it doesn't bother me that much. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Also, is the plan really to only make 26 episodes of this?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The boss character seems miscast. I hope she's not heavily featured in upcoming episodes. She doesn't have real fire. She's just periodically shouting.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I have a problem with the way this show is shot. I can't explain it but I feel like it's holding the show back in a monumental way. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
The two lead characters are not really sparkling. I feel like you get glimpses of it when they laugh or smile which is a bit of an acting cheat. For the most part even the most wooden and deadpan actors can bring life and emotion to their faces by smiling.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Cristin Millioti is also slightly miscast as the female rom com character with her defenses up. She's just too charming and adorable. The woman is constantly laughing. For God's sake she's cooing over a puppy.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
And... the internet stalking commences.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
I don't know if Ben Feldman's energy was a little low through most of this or they were just shooting him from bad angles. It might have been a little of both. </div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Trope Count</b></div>
<div>
1. A female character who craves control and has her defenses up</div>
<div>
2. Idealistic character leaps to conclusions about destiny and/or love and scares off cynical character.</div>
<div>
3. Climactic bad date in a public setting. They draw attention to themselves. </div>
<div>
4. Stereotypical male best friend for Andrew</div>
<div>
5. Stereotypical female best friend for Zelda</div>
<div>
6. Stereotypical best friends hook up.</div>
<div>
7. Stereotypical programmer characters</div>
<div>
8. Shenanigans are revealed just as one character is apologizing to another</div>
<div>
9. B plot relevation about a fake identity</div>
<div>
10. A drink is thrown in someone's face</div>
<div>
11. Guest star/childhood icon/mentor callback</div>
<div>
12. Best friend's indignation leads Zelda to stumble onto her own feelings about Andrew</div>
<div>
13. Silver dress reveal</div>
<div>
14. Kiss by the fountain</div>
<div>
<b><br /></b></div>
<div>
<b>Final Conclusion:</b> I think the show is a little off tonally and the script was pretty weak but by the end I was completely charmed by Cristin Millioti so I'll hang in there for a bit. Hopefully it'll start to feel like they're playing with rom com tropes instead of just recycling them in the coming episodes.</div>
</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-13363387582412373372014-10-22T15:52:00.001-04:002014-10-22T15:52:13.602-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Happyland<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here. You may be thinking... what the hell is Happyland? Well, you clearly haven't been sucked into the world of half hour MTV scripted teen shows. I have. It all started with Awkward. Awkward was a really great, fun, overly dramatic show in season 1 similar to Ugly Betty. It was still a pretty good show in season 2 with some missteps but still enough of those little jokes and unexpected moments to keep things interesting. It was a pretty bad show in season 3. Now it's season 4 and I'm seriously considering giving it up but I have a problem quitting shows unless they conflict with something else on my DVR. Awkward was my gateway drug into Faking It and Finding Carter. Faking It started with a pretty good first episode and then never really found its feet. Every so often it wins me back with a solid episode but the rest of the time I'm on the verge of deleting it from my DVR schedule. Finding Carter had a good premise and never stopped being boring and terrible. I'm not sure why I watched a whole season of it. Seriously, I have a Netflix subscription. I'm not sure why I continue to watch terrible shows.<br />
<br />
Happyland, in case that long diversion didn't clue you in, is another attempt to launch an MTV scripted show. I had really no idea what it was going to be about going into the pilot but it does feature the actor who played Austin on Awkward which was enough to get me interested in checking it out.<br />
<br />
OK, onto my actual thoughts on the pilot. The show doesn't exactly look cheap but it's a letdown if this is supposed to be a Disney knockoff. I'm also not that impressed with the fact that the show is set in an amusement park. It's been done. But I've actually seen a few episodes at the time I'm writing this and I think they're doing a pretty good job of integrating the amusement park into the plotlines... unlike every show at a school where they're never in class. I find Shane Harper to be a decent anchor for the series as Ian Chandler but they're not really letting him build his stereotype before breaking it down. I needed more of him being an arrogant jerk before flipping that and humanizing him and showing more depth. Everything just happened too quickly and there was a bit too much of his twitchy awkwardness as his Austin character on Awkward for me to really believe him as the character they were selling. In general, everyone on the show stops short of being as extreme as they should be. It's not about restrained or subtle acting. When you're in a certain genre, you need to play to that genre. There's a certain charm and ease with which a good actor can throw himself into a lighthearted part. You play it broad but you don't feel like a caricature. It's not bad acting, but you need to bring a certain level of energy. Think of romantic comedy acting. You have to commit to that or you come across as bland and lacking in personality.<br />
<br />
The plot in the pilot made this feel a bit like a DCOM (Disney Channel Original Movie) or a Lifetime or Hallmark movie. But it was all condensed into thirty minutes. The writing came across as a little cold, a little too removed. It was like they were too focused on getting out certain information about the characters rather than writing natural dialogue. I just felt like they didn't trust that I would keep watching and so they crammed a ton of plot into the pilot that it couldn't handle. I kept getting the sense that scenes had been cut out. The main character, Lucy, felt particularly inconsistent because she had to jump through so many emotional hurdles in such a short period of time. It's very obvious what kind of character they wanted her to be. But they contradicted that character by making her have all these emotional outbursts and not allowing her to be competent. As with the Ian character, you have to establish the character type fully before you break it down.<br />
<br />
<b>Final Conclusion: </b>I'm interested in seeing where this goes so I'll stick with it. I worry about the quality of the acting though. Everyone is very bland so far. </div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-66530992507532788742014-10-16T23:55:00.000-04:002014-10-16T23:55:10.429-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: The Mysteries of Laura<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here. So I watch Castle. I watched Bones (I had to give it up when it just became too unbearable). I don't mind a lighthearted little procedural. How bad could this be?<br />
<br />
Action packed, attention grabbing opening? Check.<br />
<br />
There is a curious lack of tension with this armed suspect running around a ton of innocent bystanders and small children. I get that you don't want people to panic but maybe exercise a little more urgency?<br />
<br />
"Don't be stupid, lady."<br />
"Excuse me, it's detective, and I really think you should put the gun down. I'm a little type A and I practice all the time with this thing."<br />
That would have been so much better without the last sentence.<br />
<br />
So far they're doing a bang up job of making it clear that she's messy and has a mothering instinct.<br />
<br />
Ponytail and suit. Let me guess, is she this show's Santiago?<br />
<br />
Why does she apparently get along with all the men in the precinct but not the other female officer? Well, I did see another female cop through a glass partition but she didn't have speaking lines or get a name so I feel like that doesn't count.<br />
<br />
When did they start allowing people to say "bitch" and "douchebag" on primetime network TV?<br />
<br />
So her soon to be ex-husband is an even bigger slacker when it comes to personal relationships but he also happens to be a lieutenant? Oh, show. You're so full of contradictions.<br />
<br />
I liked the scene of her singing to herself in her car. What can I say? I'm a sucker for singing.<br />
<br />
She enjoys imbibing liquor and has a healthy appetite. I'm learning so much about this strikingly unique female character.<br />
<br />
Well that was a really weird setup for a murder. I guess the old fashioned way of discovering a body on police procedurals was just too simple? And they needed to get in those rich people jokes? Speaking of jokes, there are a lot of them. Bad ones.<br />
<br />
"You will figure it out. You're very resourceful. That's what I love about you."<br />
Nice job sidestepping any responsibility there.<br />
<br />
On the list of stereotypical gay characters, I feel like the investigative aide is not that bad. The bouncer they meet in the next scene though? Why, guys? Why do you do this?<br />
<br />
Thinly veiled excuse to get Debra Messing in a swimsuit as well as show off a bunch of fit young extras? Check.<br />
<br />
"He left the girly file case in his car parked with the valet across the street from the girly Tai Chi class on the Highline."<br />
Ooo, bad show.<br />
<br />
Questionable blackmailing and means of searching a vehicle...<br />
<br />
She drinks soup sloppily. Are most of her "quirks" going to be food related. Is this what they teach in female character writing 101?<br />
<br />
That was a nice moment of empathy between Debra Messing and the suspect. I would listen to an audiobook she narrated.<br />
<br />
Oh, good. Characters telling her what a good mom she is.<br />
<br />
Well, I didn't see that ending coming. Mainly because that would have been a good actor to keep on the show. But the actual ending? Well, that was pretty obvious.<br />
<br />
<b>Final Conclusion: </b>It's watchable. It's not a great show but if you're looking for something kind of innocuous and familiar it fits the bill. It's not a show you need to catch every week but I've seen worse. It's more in line with the Monk's and Psych's which include a lot of the protagonist's life in the content of the show and less like the Castle's and Bones' which downplay that aspect for the case of the week. I don't find her home and family life that compelling so I think that holds this show back from being as easily digestible as a procedural as it could be.</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-48864023179040241772014-10-16T23:11:00.002-04:002014-10-16T23:11:14.700-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Bad Judge<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here. I'll keep this one quick, mainly because I didn't take any notes. Bad Judge is very much in the vein of two shows I watched last season, Rake and Bad Teacher. Look, I make bad choices.<br />
<br />
The show is more like Bad Teacher than Rake, not because it has a female protagonist and features Ryan Hansen as a love interest, but because it doesn't really allow its lead character to be charismatic and is too focused on downplaying any "badness." I've never seen Kate Walsh in anything else but she does have her moments in the pilot. However, those moments are few and far between because of how this part is written. Rake allowed Greg Kinnear to showboat and show off his starpower and charisma. Bad Judge holds Kate Walsh back so that a lot of the moments where she shines are the moments when she can take a breath and react to what another character is doing or saying. In a way, the show doesn't let her be the star.<br />
<br />
I've read that the pilot they showed on TV is not the same pilot they originally sent to critics and it shows in the way the story doesn't hold together. The structure is very off and the Robbie plotline doesn't fit in well at all.<br />
<br />
My last complaint is about the last scene in the bar which seems to set up the dynamic of the series as one girl and five guys. Come on, now. Bad Teacher at least had a better gender balance.<br />
<br />
<b>Final Conclusion: </b>I'd skip this one. I can't see it lasting and there's not much there there to attach yourself to. I'm certainly not going to stick with it.</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-58503299290558293832014-10-03T02:19:00.000-04:002014-10-03T02:19:12.971-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Manhattan Love Story<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here. So I kind of have a weakness for shows that people tell me I shouldn't be watching. I haven't made myself sit down for a Breaking Bad or Mad Men marathon even though I've had Netflix for months now. But did I watch a full season of Mixology and two seasons of Smash? You bet I did.<br />
<br />
OK, starting off, I know that there are a ton of shows that film in NY but it still makes me happy when I recognize a location.<br />
<br />
This is terribly shallow but I find the blond facial hair of the main male character very offputting.<br />
<br />
This is how I imagine executives for mainstream movies and television shows picture the male gaze.<br />
<br />
So, the male character is focused on physical appearance and the female character is focused on purses. We'll see how this goes. I'm actually not completely opposed to this as they aren't abstract characters who are supposed to represent every man and every woman. If the show plays on the fact that these are very shallow <i>individuals</i>, it could work.<br />
<br />
The secondary female character is a total stereotype but she's the most interesting person to appear on screen so far.<br />
<br />
And now David is trying to sell Peter on why he should ask Dana on a date and I am starting to see why so many critics disliked this pilot.<br />
<br />
Chloe: "No one thinks like you."<br />
Peter: "No, everyone thinks like me."<br />
<br />
If only I knew which one of these things you believed, show.<br />
<br />
Wait, are Chloe and Peter siblings?<br />
<br />
So Dana is a bit of a mess right now without being charming. I actually don't hate the voiceover and I could deal with her personality if they'd bothered to sell us on the character before launching into all of this. You have to make me like the character first. We have yet to see her be competent. At any point. In any way. You can't just launch into Carrie Bradshaw-style voiceover.<br />
<br />
"Yes, if you smash your phone, the internet disappears." got me to smile.<br />
<br />
So, I guess Dana's supposed to be a little nerdy since in the first five minutes she's already referenced Gandalf and muggles. Not sure how that makes her more human or relatable when those are two of the biggest book and film franchises ever.<br />
<br />
Also, what crazy fictional New York is this where the strangers on the bus acknowledge your existence?<br />
<br />
Hey, remember when I mentioned, Sex in the City? It's the face lady! Nina Katz. I am amused by the extras. I wonder how many of them will actually get to be fleshed out characters.<br />
<br />
"If I actually capitalize words and use punctuation, am I some kind of freak?" Ugh. Show. Stop it. Was this written by committee?<br />
<br />
Do they not have cell phones in Texas? She's in her twenties and not a Martian. How can she be this bad at using her phone?<br />
<br />
Aw, her mean publishing supervisor got her stuck in the stairwell and she ended up putting her foot in a puddle of dirty water in a back alley. I feel like this show wants me to be more sympathetic and charmed by this.<br />
<br />
The opening date banter wasn't terrible. Then the voiceovers came back in. Now I'm starting to find them annoying. I have transitioned to mildly amused. Sure, there are a lot of bad points but I'm fairly forgiving when it comes to pilots and there's always the chance that things could get a lot better in the second episode as long as there are a few bright spots in the pilot.<br />
<br />
OK, show. I'm mildly amused and slightly charmed. "Is he crying? Great. Just when I start to like him, turns out he's gay." Ugh. Why do you have to ruin everything?<br />
<br />
I liked the stinger with Amy. She's a character who in another story would easily be a villain or antagonist. I don't know why but right now she's the most interesting thing about the show to me.<br />
<br />
<b>Final Conclusion: </b>There were a lot of cliches and jokes of questionable taste but for a twenty two minute pilot it wasn't that awful. I'll tune in for a second episode though I can't in good conscience recommend that you do the same.</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8694382911701289142.post-44256970300130438912014-10-01T23:09:00.002-04:002014-10-03T02:19:27.295-04:00Underthinking Pilot Season: Stalker<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
Cat here. Look, I'm not proud of it but I ended up watching the pilot of Stalker today. I didn't take any notes. I just decided to let the craziness wash over me. Here are some thoughts.<br />
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Oh, very clever. There are two detectives and one has been stalked while another is a stalker. Parallels! Also, why are the female detectives so irritable?</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
Well, they certainly started with a bang. I'm not sure throwing gasoline at people and self-immolation is the usual M.O. of stalkers but I'm sure they did their research.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
God, there are a lot of recognizable actors in this show. Look, it's Wendell from Bones! And Serena from Law & Order! And... that girl. Hold on. I can get it. It's coming to me... Nope. I had to look it up on imdb. Mariana Klaveno plays Peri on Devious Maids.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
They decided to end the episode with cover of Creep. Because that's totally original.</div>
<div>
<br /></div>
<div>
<b>Final Conclusion: </b>Unless you're really looking for something darker but also more bland to add to the list of procedurals you watch on a regular basis, I'd say skip Stalker. In spite of the fire and explosions, it's not that exciting or compelling. There are hours of cop series on Netflix. Watch one of those or the reruns that have now migrated beyond the bounds of TNT.</div>
</div>
DivergingAnalysishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15482952188527777333noreply@blogger.com